SHOULD GEORGE W. BUSH GET MORE CREDIT FOR GETTING BIN LADEN?

HERE IS WHAT SOME ORDINARY AMERICANS ARE SAYING...

- And why should he get credit or ANYTHING, when he takes responsibility for nothing. If anything, he and his administration hampered the efforts to find Bin Laden; Allowing him to get away near Tora Bora; outing Valerie Plame, violating the Geneva Convention; dropping the ball in Afganistan to go into Iraq (because of some daddy complex); and on and on. AND allowing 9/11 to happen in the first place because the Bush administration arrogantly ignored the warnings of the Clinton admnstration.

- President Bush was elected in 2000 and 9/11 occurred in 2001. Bush's administration was warned that terrorists were planning something big, possibly with planes and they ignored the warnings. Then all hell broke loose. He then couldn't catch Bin Laden for the next 7 years. Probably due to the fact that he diverted intelligence and military resources towards Saddam Hussein who, bastard though he was, did not have any WMDs. Why on earth should President Bush deserve any credit? 

- It is going to take a while, but eventually historians will sort out the kind of credit Bush and his puppetmasters and hangers on deserve, and it isn't going to be pretty. America sank pretty low and we are only beginning to dig our way out of the pits of self-interest, deregulation, hypocrisy and demagoguery of the arrogant religionist right.

- Far from taking credit for anything, Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld should be on trial for starting a war based on lies, war profiteering, (remember Halliburton), and destroying the economy, not to mention the thousands of lives wasted for no reason. It will take decades to undo the damage that the Bush administration created

- Bush had no interest in capturing or killing Bin Laden , Hyping up the war with lies and torture, prosecute instead of giving credit to this oil for blood hypocrite ....

The comments shown above are those of some ordinary American's who apparently are not convinced.